Over 59026
politifake

Gore Politics


THE POLL RESULTS ARE IN! - 9 out of 10 Polar Bears surveyed think Al Gore is full of crap!




AL GORE'S NEW CRIB - Why would anyone who claims that the oceans are going to rise 20 feet buy a $9M ocean-front villa in Montecito, CA. Unless of course, they know that claim is complete BS.




THE INTERNET - You just can't stand the fact that he thought of it first.




Global Warming Is A Hoax -




NOT ONLY A MEMBER - The founder also




Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -


TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward


FROM THE CHURCH OF CLIMATOLOGY - The heretic doth speaketh




GLOBAL WARMING: A NATURAL EARTH CYCLE - Get Over It!




TYPICAL WEALTHY LEFT WING LIBERAL HYPOCRITE OF THE DAY -


TAGS: al gore
Rating: 4.95/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - January 9, 2013, 12:56 pm
Unfortunately my friend, the concept of hard hitting journalism has been replaced by propagandists repeating liberal Democrat dogma.
deerbag2 - January 9, 2013, 11:38 am
Where are all the hard hitting journalists asking him questions?


MILESTONES - Five years since a hurricane landfall in the United States. Hasn't happened since 1910-1914. The Prophecy Fail continues.




CLIMATE ALARMIST HYPOCRITES - 140 private jets, 1,200 limos and 40K tons of CO2. In one week these clowns will create a carbon footprint equal to the annual footprint of 30 small countries.




THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMM... -


TAGS: al gore s seaside mansion
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

OTC - June 8, 2014, 1:00 pm
Must be a flood insurance scam


Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


TED KACZYNSKI - Distinguished Harvard Alumni Class of 1962




Bloviating Windbag -




Snow in Egypt -




PROOF FROM THE CHURCH OF CLIMATOLOGY - That man-made warming is responsible for disappearing bird populations




COLD AND SNOW RECORDS - According to Al Gore, they are caused by too much heat. Uh huh.




DIVORCED - She was emitting too much CO2


TAGS: al gore
Rating: 3.36/5

More politifakes by yehme



A VERY INCONVENIENT TRUTH - OOPS, It Wasn't Bush's Fault After All




AL GORE - Somehow, he managed to succeed in making conservative Republicans care about science to a certain......degree.




IMMUTABLE TRUTH - As much as liberals hollered about how bad George Bush was- imagine how bad it would have been under Al Gore!




BIGFOOT? - No, its just hypocrite Al Gore's carbon footprint, on his way to the church of global warming.




INFIDELITY? - You have to understand - she had a magnificent rack.




DISTORTION -




AN INCONVENIENT LAWSUIT - The heat Al Gore is feeling is not global warming but rather the rath of several masseuses who may be initiating civil suits.




Yoda Wisdom -




Kids have been banned from schools for this gesture -


TAGS: al gore gun gesture
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 9:10 am
I hope that thing is loaded


Al Gore goes green -


TAGS: al gore inconvenient lie
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 8:27 pm
and thats the exact f***ing opposite of what the australian government is doing, which is cutting funding for research and making it more expensive for people to get a higher education. obama may be a statist, but at least he appreciates science.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 8:24 pm
the answer is to fund research into new energy sources, and bring the price of them down below that of coal. once that happens, the entire planet will adopt those energy sources eagerly.
OTC - May 23, 2014, 4:35 pm
At least Australia is cutting funds for global warming by 90%
fauxnews - May 23, 2014, 4:27 pm
If you actually believed there is enough proof that a 2000 yr old hippie zombie once walked on water and returned from the dead after being crucifixed, then get over yourself...man-made climate change is not that much more far-fletched. Smarten up people.
fauxnews - May 23, 2014, 4:23 pm
It's simple. FACT: CO2 stays in the atmosphere for a VERY long time and traps heat. Human activity that add EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS of CO2 into the natural cyclical mix of CO2 will add to this effect, making the Earth h**ter,which studies have shown empirically
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 4:05 pm
Why don't you take the initiative, and show us how, fox. =)
foxrecon19d - May 23, 2014, 3:46 pm
Obviously, the only answer for to the problem of man-made CO2 production is for these hypocrite left-wing liberals to hold their breath until the earth heals itself. Every breath they take whining about global warming only makes the problem worse
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:35 pm
aye, it was good. we should take it to the forums later, where we arent limited to 255 letter responses.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:33 pm
that is why we can say with an extremely high degree of certainty what the ratio of gases was in the atmosphere hundreds of thousands of years ago. the bubbles are trapped, nothing can get in and nothing can get out.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:29 pm
gas composition in the atmosphere is pretty much the same everywhere, because the individual molecules bouncing around at over 700 miles per hour. chemistry is well understood, we know more about chemistry than we know about everything else put together.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:27 pm
I enjoyed this discussion, but I have to get back to work, lunch time is over. Later.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:25 pm
a millionare's "cash climate" depends almost soley upon his investments, and paid work is almost completely meaningless, but to the person living paycheck to paycheck, investments are irrelevant and dollars per hour is everything. thats the best a***ogy.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:25 pm
and, by the same token, we can only see gases in ice cores as it pertains to the area where the ice cores are taken. How do we know what caused any of the gases that were trapped there? Was there a local event? Was it global? Speculation again.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:23 pm
think science. its not magic, there has to be a specific mechanism by which infomation can be preserved. we can measure ratios of gases in ice cores, we CANT directly measure solar output 600 years ago, we can only infer it based on secondary information
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:22 pm
notice the fluctuations just over that period of time?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:21 pm
For solar activity, here's 1750 to present: http://www.ips.gov.au/Images/Educational/The%20Sun%20and%20Solar%20Activity/Solar%20Cycle/Solar%20Cycles%201%20-%2023.gif
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:20 pm
think of it this way, a pay increase of 10$ per hour doesnt mean **** to a millionare, but it means everything to someone earning 1$ per hour. solar changes affect mars because mars is "poor" and has almost no atmosphere.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:19 pm
Think Pompei. It's not hard to figure out what happened there and that was over 600 years ago.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:18 pm
but what we DO have is accurate records of carbon dioxide levels going back millions of years, thanks to trapped air in glaciers and polar icecaps. solar output doesnt mean ****.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:14 pm
"and a large number of volcanic eruptions" you mean volcanoes? that spray sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere which reflects solar energy back into space?... i dispute the notion that we have any valid way of determining solar output 600 years ago.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:14 pm
...affects this ratio, it is impossible to not make the correlation that pollution is having an effect on these cycles.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:13 pm
Not disagreeing with the a**ertion that Earth has natural cycles. I'm saying that these cycles are affected by several factors. One of these factors just happens to be the ratio of CO2 in the atmosphere. Seeing as how human activity directly...
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:13 pm
Between 1350 and 1850, the earth went thru a global cooling due to a TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT and a large number of volcanic eruptions.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:12 pm
true... i just get really pissed off when the topic of carbon taxes comes up, because of how much bull**** and uncertainty it has caused in my country. things would be so much f***ing better if there was never a carbon tax.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:11 pm
I don't think 20% is insignificant at all. Maybe that's just me though.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:11 pm
for example, between 900 and 1300, the earth experienced a prolonged period of global warming. The scientists blame it on a TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:08 pm
*rains*
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:07 pm
I disagree. The earth's climate changes over longer periods of time. That's why we have had ice ages (mini and major) and years of severe droughts and years of torrential rais over the life span of the earth.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:07 pm
ill tell you what caused it, A TINY CHANGE IN SOLAR OUTPUT. mars's climate is extremely unstable, EARTHS IS NOT. to change the earth's climate, you have to f*** with the composition of its atmosphere.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:06 pm
I'm just saying that it's not 'absolutely none'.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:05 pm
Mature forests take in CO2 and produce oxygen, but give off about the same in CO2 when old trees die.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:05 pm
again, earth's climate is self regulating, mars's climate is much more unstable. mars's climate shifts wildly over the span of a few decades, whereas the earths is virtually unchanging in comparison.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 3:02 pm
You do understand that the 'ice' on Mars is actually frozen CO2, and not frozen H2O, yes?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:01 pm
what caused mars to suddenly lose it's ice caps over that 10 year period. The amount of CO2 didn't change.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 3:01 pm
its ignored because it really doesnt have much of an effect. the vast majority of biomass on earth is in the oceans, and something like 80% of our oxygen comes from ocean dwelling phytoplankton and plants.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 3:00 pm
There are huge sections of forest around the world that are being destroyed to create charcoal to heat homes. Trees consume CO2 and produce Oxygen. So, yes, I see man's contribution to the increase, but that still leaves the mystery of mars polar ice melt
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:59 pm
there is no f***ing way that is worth massive cuts to science funding, massive increases to university tuition, and a government soely concerned with controlling the media and making it easier for rupert murdoch to attain a media monopoly.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:57 pm
An often ignored factor, in the debate, is deforestation. In the last 100 years, the worlds forests have shrunk dramatically. (some estimates say 50%)
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:56 pm
when we burn carbon dug up from the ground, we are increasing the amount of carbon in the carbon cycle, it takes millions of years for that carbon to be resequestered in geological deposits.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:55 pm
I'm not sure about your 'absolutely none' opinion. There's several reports online stating the opposite. Specifically a drop in pollution of 13% in the electricity sector alone.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:53 pm
and I believe we are at a whopping 0.4% carbon dioxide. Yet our polar ice is melting just like the polar ice is melting on mars.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:52 pm
yes, because the earth has a self-regulating system due to the massive quantities of liquid water on the surface. the problem with a self regulating system is if you change the ratio of gases in the atmosphere, it has dramatic effects upon heat absorbance
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
and we are still a far cry away from 95.7% carbon dioxide in our atmosphere.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
so, solar energy, from the same sun that we have, made the changes on mars, but had little or no effect on earth?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:51 pm
the reason CO2 matters on earth isnt because we burn it, its because we're digging it up from geological deposits which have been isolated from the carbon cycle for hundreds of millions of years.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:50 pm
changes in solar energy output resulting in climate shifts. mars has no oceans or life to regulate the climate like on earth, mars' is very unstable.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:49 pm
that means that the USA could learn from Australia, but it won't
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:49 pm
And CO2 reflects heat, or traps it, Emma?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:48 pm
absolutely none. since 2013, "supporting a carbon tax" has been the top of the list of "stupidest f***ing things ever", just ahead of "cleaning a loaded gun while pointing it at your face" and "leaving loaded guns around young kids unsup***ised"
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:48 pm
and the correct figure is 95.7% carbon dioxide and 2.7% nitrogen
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:46 pm
and how did man contribute to that? Did the carbon dioxide just mysteriously appear in 1995?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:46 pm
thats actually pretty funny, because you just got f***ing owned. the score is now 1:1. mars's atmosphere is 99% carbon dioxide.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:45 pm
what effect did the carbon tax have on pollution?
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:43 pm
I don't hate republicans TA.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:41 pm
and f***ING NOTHING is worth that price. our prime minister does whatever the f*** rupert murdoch tells him to do, and yes, its THAT rupert murdoch, the guy who OWNS FOX NEWS. you have no idea how much worse things could be. beware the carbon tax.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:37 pm
our "leftie" government brought in a carbon tax a year before the election, and they got completely destroyed in the polls. australia is now run by a complete f***wit. that is the price of a carbon tax, it turns your government conservative.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 2:36 pm
i completely disagree with everything you just said. you're smart, but you let your hate for republicans cloud your judgement. my opposition to carbon taxes has nothing to do with ideology, and everything to do with experiencing a carbon tax in australia
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:18 pm
Answer the three questions in 66862, and you'll have the answer to your own question Emma.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:15 pm
Seeing as how you know everything about climate change, clown, how about explaining why mars is going thru climate change without the presence of man
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 2:14 pm
Seeing as how you know everything Emma, A) what's Mars' atmosphere comprised of, mainly? B) what's it's density in relation to earth's atmosphere? C) What effect do these differences create vis-a-vis the effect of the sun on the individual planets?
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:11 pm
on mars than earth.
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 2:10 pm
Uh, I hate to break it to you clown, but the polar ice caps are melting without human intervention or pollution. And it looks like it's happening at a faster rate.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 1:49 pm
Most conservatives are only concerned about money. A carbon tax is the only incentive that they'll understand. IMO.
crankyhead - May 23, 2014, 1:45 pm
Um, hate to break it to you Emma, but there aren't any people living on Mars yet. However, if we did, and we were pumping trillions of tonnes of CO2 into Mars' atmosphere every year, the answer to that question would be; 'a noticeable affect.'
OTC - May 23, 2014, 7:55 am
Those man-made land rovers we sent there, now liberals will have come up with another tax to stop that too
EmmaRoydes - May 23, 2014, 1:32 am
Climate change on Mars is real as well and mimics the changes on earth. What effect does man made pollution on earth have on Mars?
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 1:04 am
I.E. climate change is real, but that doesnt mean a carbon tax is a good idea. a carbon tax is among the most f***ing retarded ideas in human history, you dont have to deny climate change to oppose f***tarded government interference in the economy.
terroraustralis - May 23, 2014, 1:03 am
"something i dont understand is being used to justify policies i dont understand! it must be a CONSPIRACY!". you cant fight ultra-lefty f***tards by denying the truth, you fight them by pointing out how retarded their solutions are.
EmmaRoydes - May 22, 2014, 6:15 pm
New book by Al Gore: "Pimp My Planet"


The Nobel peace prize -


TAGS: image of gore
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Doggit

JGalt - May 9, 2013, 11:15 pm
a slide show on "Weather" because now it is politically incorrect- you have to say "climate change" in the face of obvious contrary weather patterns. Double-speak politicians. Al should give back his medal
Curlyrocks - May 9, 2013, 8:04 pm
WOW THAT PI$$ES ME OFF. That slide show had nothing to do with world peace and everything to do with proving issues with changing chemical make up of the atmosphere. there's already a Nobel Prize in Chemistry if his work was so great give him that.


Still waiting al... -




GOREBAL WARMING - Al Gore Is An IDIOT. Al Gore Didn't Invent Ihe Internet. He Invented Global Warming.




GORE, HYPOCRACY AND THE GREEN COLLAPSE - Socialist ideas are so out of wack with reality that they vaporize when they come into contact with the real world




THIS IS THE ONLY TYPE OF GREEN - Al Gore cares about! Global Warming is a Man Made Lie. Al Gore Sucks.


TAGS: gore democrats fraud
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

JGalt - January 7, 2013, 6:52 am
http://conservativevideos.com/2013/01/leno-asks-current-tvs-joy-behar-osama-bin-laden-is-your-new-boss/


W.A.S.P. -




Global Warming Truth -




JAMIE GORELICK - on the FBI director short list to be rewarded for Fannie Mae




SOPHISTICAL REFUTATIONS - 2300 years after Aristotle wrote this classic, a D science student still needs the argumentum ad populum and other logical fallacies to push the dead horse of man-made global warming. Because the data isn't there.




The Climate Crusader -




Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Al Gore -




STOP GLOBAL WARMING - Live like Al Gore!




Climate Change Garbage -


TAGS: warming algore climate change
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by PeteofSanJose

PeteofSanJose - January 30, 2014, 1:34 am
I remember in grade school being told that at one time North America, it was covered by glacier ice. THEN we had global warming and the ice retreated. It formed the Grand Canyon. It's called a natural cycle. Happened before and will again
PeteofSanJose - January 30, 2014, 1:32 am
Thats funny right there, I dont care who you are!!!
OTC - January 29, 2014, 6:03 pm
Martians ignored the 'Martian-Made' Global Warming climate scientists...
Curlyrocks - January 29, 2014, 1:47 pm
Oh yeah all planets climates are changing all the time. There may have been a layer of ice or frost at one point but like dry ice on earth it would instantly evaporate when warmed and be carried by the winds to re-solidify at the coldest part, the poles.
PeteofSanJose - January 29, 2014, 12:16 pm
the report I listened to was about the ROVER discovering water from eons ago. Scientist did not say what "type" of water or how long ago, just that it was there. And now it is not. so the conclusion was, global change of some sort at some time.
Curlyrocks - January 29, 2014, 9:47 am
I don't think there ever was liquid water on Mars. The atmosphere on Mars is too thin to support liquid water, becasue Mars only has 1/3 earths gravity. Unless Mars used to be bigger and support a thicker atmosphere liquid water only exists under ground.


Stupidity -


TAGS: gore climate stupidity
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - October 11, 2014, 1:21 pm
I'm not in the habit of defending this moron, but here, it's really just a case of semantics. The silk is passing through the udders like he said, just not all by itself. You could take it either way.
terroraustralis - October 5, 2014, 7:14 pm
gore is wrong on this one, the milk of the goats contains spider silk protein, which must be seperated from the milk before it can be spun into fibers for things like bulletproof vests


DON'T BLAME ME, BLAME THE ALTITUDE! - Because, per Al Gore,once you go over 5,000 feet Obama can't debate because "It is just too dang high".....


TAGS: gore obama debate altitude blame
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by mdbenedict

jaxx - October 4, 2012, 7:51 pm
He is such an A-Hole....Wait! They are both A-Holes!


Climate Crusader -




Man-made Global Warming: Another fraud brought to you by Democrats -




END-OF-THE-WORLD PROPHECIES - Both of these loons deserve equal derision.




Al Gore invented the internet -




LIBERAL CANNOT BE PRECEDED BY THE FOLLOWING: - Intelligent, Coherent, Logical, Fair, Honest, Interesting, Correct, emotionally sound, moral, frugal, clairvoyant, aware, understanding, humble, objective, loving,etc.




SUSTAINABILITY, LEADING BY EXAMPLE - Ignored by the mainstream media, Al Gore's new $9 million dollar digs in Montecito, California. Way to go Earth Boy!




SUBMARINES -




AL GORE - Another scary Democrat




WEATHER -




GLOBAL WARMING - As perceived by Al Gore




WINTER WEATHER - Think Antarctica is cold Try America




AL BORE - "a convenient lie" follow the money




SMOKING AND FROZEN AL GORE - He's back with a vengeance in 2010, this time blowing more smoke then before




HEY DAD - Whats global warming? Well son don't listen to Al Gore




DEADLY CO2 - Made up by Al Gore




OBAMA AND GORE - One lies and the other one swears to it Wait they both lie




PSYCHIATRIC TRAUMA - Poor fellow wandered into the web site with pics of a naked Al Gore.




PERFECT LANDING - In the Antarctica because the Kennedy Space Center had to much snow




The problem is indifference -


TAGS: al gore lied to homo***uals
Rating: 3.29/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

Curlyrocks - April 23, 2013, 7:48 pm
Are you referring to Gores new all for g** marriage attitude? I don't believe it at all. If democrats cared about the [email protected] community at all this argument would be over since the only argument republicans have is eww gross which means nothing.
PapaFox - April 23, 2013, 7:32 pm
LOL talk about a low information voter! :-D


"LIBERAL DEMOCRATS" - Don't worry, they're more likely to take away your Twisted Sister, Frank Zappa, and John Denver albums than your guns.


TAGS: al tipper gore pmrc democrats
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - January 17, 2013, 9:16 pm
Frank Zappa was the most entertaining part of those stupid PMRC hearings.
EmilioDumphque - January 17, 2013, 5:56 pm
"I wrote a song about flossing, but did anybody's teeth get better?" -Frank Zappa


GLOBAL WARMING - Notice that sunspot activity has dramatically increased since Al Gore was born! Obviously his carbon footprint is too big!




Albert Gore -




Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -




Democrat War On Coal -




Global Warming Junk Science -




The Ever-Greater Pause -




The Father of Global Warming -




The Cult Of Climatology -


TAGS: church of climatology prophet al gore goran climat change cult zealots global warming alarmists junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - March 23, 2015, 10:12 pm
"god sends hurricanes because you burn too much coal!" would have been funnier.


Albert Gore, Jr. -




The Father of Global Warming -




The Father of Global Warming -




GloBULL Warming -




The Father of Global Warming -




The Father of Global Warming -




2014 Was NOT The Warmest Year Ever -


TAGS: climate change hoax global warming scam junk science al gore ipcc nasa urban heat island effect satellite temperatures
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 21, 2015, 11:18 pm
You forgot to account for the "data adjustment: that turned a cooling trend into a warming trend.


Linerals and "Global Warming" -




An Inconvenient Truth -




Climate Change -




1970s Flashback -




Climategate -




I'll Observe Earth Day... -




Wacky Warmists -




EPA's Green Tyranny -




Greenpeace Hypocrisy -




The TRUTH about Dr. Wei-Hock Soon -




Goodbye & Good Riddance, Al Jazeera -




Climate Change Idiocy -




Another Failed Global Warming Prediction -


TAGS: abc failed global warming prediction opportunistic hysteria peddlers hysterians greenies warmists alarmists al gore chris cuomo climate change hoax eco fascism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

OTC - June 13, 2015, 11:02 pm
I recently read a blog from 2008 that ended with "put the final nail in the coffin of global cooling." There hasn't been any warming in the past 18 years, and that blog was 7 yrs ago. That must be some sweet tasting kool-aid


Stupid Climate Alarmists -


TAGS: climate alarmists warmists greenies hysterians global warming hoax climate change stupidity scam fraud eco fascism al gore ipcc liberals progressives democrats socialism globalization nwo agenda 21 statism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 5:29 pm
What about it would "tick me" off, Curly? :) I rarely comment on his "parodies." Anytime I am having a restless night and in need of a sedative, I always know where to turn - albeit, these short-form ones are an anomaly, being the exception to that rule.
Curlyrocks - May 7, 2015, 5:08 pm
I know what you mean. I was going to blow by it, saw that something about it had ticked you you off, read it, and gave it 5L. Well said CI
rebeccaolsen - May 7, 2015, 11:23 am
I love it how, regardless of our all differences, we are all in agreement (mostly through habit) to ignore the "contributions" from… wait for it… dunh dunh dunh…. TheConservativeInsurgent :)


Hollyweird Hypocrite -




Global Warming Alarmists' New Claim: Satellites Are Lying -


TAGS: global warming hoax satellite temperature data climate change scam junk science the pause warmists alarmists hysterians ipcc nasa al gore john christy deniers skeptics greenies green religion eco fascism
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 12, 2016, 2:12 am
There is also the U.S. Climate Reference Network USCRN witch [sic] is supposed to be so accurate that its numbers never need adjusting. It shows a declaine in US temp where the adjusted number show an increase.


Warmist Stupidity -




Climate Con -




Surprise, Surprise: Monetary Redistribution Plan Is Key For Upcoming Paris Climate Change Talks -




Global Warming Hysterian -


TAGS: al gore global warming hysterian climate change hoax scam fraud green religion greenies alarmists warmists ipcc inconvenient truth eco fascism junk science
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - May 3, 2015, 11:49 pm
There's a reason I call Gore The Profit of Global Warming. He made a lot of dough off the hysteria he spreads, but that doesn't make the theory itself invalid.


Climate Alarmism -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE